Evaluation of applications is performed by evaluation panels composed by experts with recognized experience and scientific merit. All admissible applications must be graded from zero (0.000, minimum) to five (5.000, maximum) in each of the three evaluation criteria:
Criterion A – Merit of the Applicant
Criterion B – Merit of the Work Plan
Criterion C – Merit of the Hosting Conditions
The relative weights of three criteria are 30%, 40%, 30%, respectively.
The merit of the applicant is assessed based on two sub-criteria: academic career, with a weighting of 50%, and personal CV, also with a weighting of 50%.
The evaluation of the candidate's personal CV is carried out in an integrated way, based on a global view of the merit of their scientific and professional career.
The evaluation of the work plan and hosting conditions is based on the panel's qualitative assessment, duly substantiated.
Applications will be ranked according to the weighted average classification in the three criteria, and in the following order of precedence, for tiebreaker purposes: criterion B (Merit of the Work Plan), criterion A (Merit of the Applicant) and criterion C (Merit of the Hosting Conditions).
Applications evaluated with a final classification lower than three values (3,000) are not eligible for granting a studentship.
The procedures concerning the evaluation process are available in the Evaluation Guide, and the Notice of the Call was republished for additional clarifications. Other supporting documents for the application will be made available soon.